Husbands, Wives, and Hate
I immoderately enjoy Spengler's column in Asia Times, but this last week's edition stuck out for a number of reasons. First was the subject (Obama), second was an unusually vituperative tone, and third was the amount of personal information disclosed. Something about Obama must have struck a nerve.
But that's not what this post is about. Spengler makes an off-hand generalization, key to his argument: "Spouses do not necessarily share their likes, but they must have their hatreds in common."
At first glance, it seems like one of those remarks that are both plausible and insightful, mostly because you've never thought about it before. It reminded me of Tolstoy's famous opening line in Anna Kerenina ("All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.") As many have noted, Tolstoy is as wrong. A moment's reflection is enough to convince one of the exact opposite.*
So is Spengler correct? I think not. Certainly not in my own marriage. There are lots of things I hate that my wife either loves or is indifferent toward (e.g. coffee and Apple Computer respectively). On the other hand, my wife is not as much of a hater as I am, though there are few things I can think of (talk radio, rodents). Of course, these examples are trivial and may not answer as proof. However, in my observations of other marriages, I can think of enough counter-examples to call the universality of his pronouncement into question.
Any thoughts?
* It would be interesting to discuss why people might be attracted to Tolstoy's assertion.
But that's not what this post is about. Spengler makes an off-hand generalization, key to his argument: "Spouses do not necessarily share their likes, but they must have their hatreds in common."
At first glance, it seems like one of those remarks that are both plausible and insightful, mostly because you've never thought about it before. It reminded me of Tolstoy's famous opening line in Anna Kerenina ("All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.") As many have noted, Tolstoy is as wrong. A moment's reflection is enough to convince one of the exact opposite.*
So is Spengler correct? I think not. Certainly not in my own marriage. There are lots of things I hate that my wife either loves or is indifferent toward (e.g. coffee and Apple Computer respectively). On the other hand, my wife is not as much of a hater as I am, though there are few things I can think of (talk radio, rodents). Of course, these examples are trivial and may not answer as proof. However, in my observations of other marriages, I can think of enough counter-examples to call the universality of his pronouncement into question.
Any thoughts?
* It would be interesting to discuss why people might be attracted to Tolstoy's assertion.


5 Comments:
I think there is validity to the statement. He qualifies it by writing "not necessarily". Also I think likes are not on equal plane to hatreds. Not that it's a right way to live, but I do think it can be the basis of common hatred for something is very powerful.
From a purely sociologic point of view the notion of being a co-belligerent comes to mind. People come together to fight a common cause and sometimes the unity of their hatred binds together when no other common thought exists.
By
ron, At
February 28, 2008 6:00 AM
Since you posted this, I've been waiting for the inspiration that spurs an insightful comment. I need to move on so the best I have to offer is "Hate. What a great label."
By
Pat Stream, At
February 28, 2008 7:55 AM
If we hated the same things we would not be individuals;
Although sometimes it is just more simple to agree- rather than cause disention in the unity of marriage
:)
By
LauraLynn, At
February 29, 2008 12:12 PM
distention.
I. Can. Spell.
By
LauraLynn, At
February 29, 2008 12:16 PM
Disagree. Like in most marriages, we have nothing in commom. Not even our hates.
By
Reegz, At
March 10, 2008 6:53 AM
Post a Comment
<$I18N$LinksToThisPost>:
Create a Link
<< Home