Burtonia Blogs

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Snicket the High Brow

I admire what Lemony Snicket has done in his "Series of Unfortunate Events". He developed a unique style and format for Kid Lit that incorporated humorous pessimism and an intrusive narrative voice into the standard serial cliffhanger genre. When I first encountered it, my reaction was, "Why didn't I think of that?" What I most like about his writing, though, is his evident love for words, and a determination to teach kids vocabulary through reading.

There is however, something not quite right in "Events." I've listened to the first book on tape, and browsed through a number of the others (one of my children is a fan). What I noticed is the tendancy to insert references to serious literature in the stories (Tolstoy, Melville, etc.). There's nothing wrong with that, many of them are so offhand, kids won't have any idea to what he is talking about. I can't be sure without reading all 2000 pages of the series, but I think this technique becomes more explicit and even troubling as the series progresses.

For instance, I stumbled on this in Book 12, "The Penultimate Peril":

Richard Wright, an American novelist of the realist school, asks a famous unfathomable question in his best-known novel, Native Son. "Who knows when some slight shock," he asks, "disturbing the delicate balance between social order and thirsty aspiration, shall send the skyscrapers of our cities toppling?"

He then goes on for an entire page to explicate this "unfathomable" quotation. These books, I have to remind you, are intended for readers age 9-12. Nine years old to twelve years old. Native Son deals with racism, murder, institutional injustice, sexual violence (allusions to), and is informed by the communist world view of its author. The quote is famous, but not as impenetrable as Snicket implies - it's simple Marxist apocalyptic wishful thinking.

Once again, Snicket is writing for children, ages nine through twelve.

Lest you think this an isolated example, I offer this bizarre passage from the Slippery Slope:

The writer who can most accurately and elegantly describe the path of the three orphans was an associate of mine who, like the man who wrote "The Road Less Traveled," is now dead. Before he died, however, he was widely regarded as a very good poet, although some people think his writings about religion were a little too mean-spirited. His name was Algernon Charles Swinburne.*

Many of you may not be familiar with the 19th century poet Swinburne who celebrated sadomasochism, lesbianism, and atheism in his work. Now my second born at least knows his name (or would if he were paying attention, which I know he wasn't).

I guess this is what happens when one becomes a best-selling children's author. Your editors no longer have any hold over you. In Snicket's case, you can see this when you glance at a shelf of the "Series", arranged in order - they grow more corpulent with each volume.

I think what is on display here is a person who really wants to be a college English professor, but wound up a writer of juvenile fiction. Or maybe he is a professor (that would explain the pen name and the funny sub rosa biographical bits).

* Those who have been reading my blog for a while might recognize a certain similarity between his style of writing and my own. Another reason I have can't condemn the man in toto. Also I must get in this dig - Because M. Scott Peck had not died yet when the Slippery Slope was written, he must be referring to Frost's The Road Not Taken. More evidence for substandard editing.

Labels: , ,

8 Comments:

  • whoa- I just liked the books because I thought they were refreshingly sharp and witty. And I equate them visually with Tim Burtonesque grunge illustrations. It's not only 9-12 year olds who are missing most of the references.
    T
    hanks for the lesson- and piquing my interest to re-read the series.

    PS- may I please borrow your copy of Crazy for God?

    By Blogger Brandy Dopkins, At January 9, 2008 9:17 AM  

  • During that re-read, tell me if you run into any references from Lolita or Lady Chatterly's Lover.

    By Blogger Jeff Burton, At January 9, 2008 10:31 AM  

  • I haven't read any of the series, but I have to wonder after reading your post, are they appropriate for children? What's your opinion?
    Also as for the substandard editing, it seems that lousy editing is the standard these days. Call me crazy.

    By Blogger erin, At January 10, 2008 2:25 PM  

  • *Obviously, since you let your kiddo read them, they must be ok??
    Didn't mean to step on toes there.

    By Blogger erin, At January 10, 2008 2:26 PM  

  • I have not encountered anything that is directly inappropriate. There might be a problem if a particularily precocious child took some of these references as "suggestions for further reading." Mostly, I think they are goofily out-of-place than anything else.

    And BTW, you are not stepping on my toes, though I understand your concern. I could write a whole series of posts on "raised eyebrows" reactions to how various Christian families make media choices.

    By Blogger Jeff Burton, At January 10, 2008 2:35 PM  

  • A note to the author of this blog:
    Having been one of the aforementioned 9-12 year-olds who have grown up on Lemony Snicket's "A Series of Unfortunate Events," I would like to emphasize that these books are fantastic for children as well as adults- there should have been no implication that they are innapropriate. While satirizing human follies, Snicket (a clever nome de plume) teaches children that life is ephemeral, bad luck is part of life, and alludes to important literary and culteral references. I appreciate your concern for Snicket's young readers, but I find your criticism hypocritical for someone who hasn't finished the series. I am an adolescent (14) and recently reread the series. As this blogger noted, Swinburne and Anna Karinena are alluded to. Also, there are references to Melville and Edgar Allen Poe. Snicket was far accomplished in these references- they may be the catalyst for some to delve into fine literature. I simply don't see the problem with these literary masters that you have outlined. Refusing to read Swinburne because of his views is akin to boycotting Whitman because of his. To put this into a more recent cultural scene, what you're suggesting is that the Beatles are terrible because they spent to much of their time acid-tripping. Snicket's references are building a more literate America. Literary allusion is the mark of higher-level literature. You said youself- your son probably wasn't paying attention to the references. What you have forgotten is that there are different facets to this series; separately, they can be enjoyed by children and adults individually. Together, they can take on a completely new level.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At February 18, 2008 6:23 PM  

  • Anonymous: I belive "allusion" is too elegant a word to describe the technique the man employs. His didactic narrarator is about as subtle as a football coach. Before your hasty denunciation, you should have taken the time to read the comments, especially my last contribution, which explains that I am making a literary criticism, rather than a moral one.

    By Blogger Jeff Burton, At February 19, 2008 5:27 AM  

  • However, your self-aggrandizing "literary criticism" is uninformed. I can't believe that you even admitted to not reading the series while attempting to critique them. That was bad form; next time, think before you spout uneducated tripe.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At March 24, 2008 6:22 PM  

Post a Comment



<$I18N$LinksToThisPost>:

Create a Link

<< Home